Personal Toolkit for Critiquing Research Articles

Personal Toolkit for Critiquing Research Articles

Develop and Apply a Personal Toolkit for Critiquing Research Articles

Personal Toolkit for Critiquing Research Articles

Article
Malina, M. A. & Selto, F. H. (2001). Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical
study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting,
13(1), 47-90. doi:10.2308/jmar.2001.13.1.47

1. Summary – A succinct summary include results of the study. That way, after reading the first paragraph, the reader would know the purpose, hypotheses, and findings.

2. What is the purpose of the study?

3. What is the sample and sample size?

4. Method used – Describe specifics about the research design, including the sample, instrumentation, and data analysis. Ecological and population generalizability were discussed.

5. What is the data analysis used? What are the results? – Explanations on the data analysis. Less specific information on statistics but more information on the literature review.

6. The discussion, conclusion, and recommendations

– Discuss threats to internal validity.

– Suggestions regarding how these threats could have been dealt with.

– Discuss the literature review.

– Show high level of understanding.

– Know what the weakness of the study.

– Provides ways the study could have been improved.

Follow this link to get a similar paper written from scratch